<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perpetua (Daniël Haazen)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freeindiegam.es/2012/08/perpetua-daniel-haazen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freeindiegam.es/2012/08/perpetua-daniel-haazen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:19:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniël Haazen</title>
		<link>http://www.freeindiegam.es/2012/08/perpetua-daniel-haazen/#comment-47577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniël Haazen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeindiegam.es/?p=2959#comment-47577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow I ruined the download, without me noticing. I&#039;ve fixed it now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I ruined the download, without me noticing. I&#8217;ve fixed it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.freeindiegam.es/2012/08/perpetua-daniel-haazen/#comment-41379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Micah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeindiegam.es/?p=2959#comment-41379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could someone let me know how to get the game to run? Windows 7 says it&#039;s broken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone let me know how to get the game to run? Windows 7 says it&#8217;s broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniël Haazen</title>
		<link>http://www.freeindiegam.es/2012/08/perpetua-daniel-haazen/#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniël Haazen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeindiegam.es/?p=2959#comment-8366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I&#039;m the creator of the game. Thanks for playing! I&#039;m not sure how to answer your question. I guess I just took the usual from games, and did the counter attack at last.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m the creator of the game. Thanks for playing! I&#8217;m not sure how to answer your question. I guess I just took the usual from games, and did the counter attack at last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.freeindiegam.es/2012/08/perpetua-daniel-haazen/#comment-7764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nobody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeindiegam.es/?p=2959#comment-7764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a neat idea, but it looks like there&#039;s a somewhat intractable design problem at its core, which is that (trying to avoid spoiling) the method the player has of triggering anything meaningful by definition gives the player the trivial ability to win the game according to the terms laid out up until then.

The easy solution would have been to make immediately clear, via the first part of the second section, that there are now other meaningful ways of having an effect on things. Instead, we have the opposite, where it&#039;s a 30-or-so-second wait each time to get to the portion of the second section where you *might* stumble upon something you can do that causes an effect. I think my point is that there&#039;s not enough there to incentivize that behavior (and that the wait between failed experimental attempts is far too long). At minimum, the order of the three movements at the beginning of the second section should have been reversed.

But I do like the idea. And its tone. Maybe I&#039;m overreacting and the (apparently) intended behavior just needs to be thought of as a secret and not as core gameplay?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a neat idea, but it looks like there&#8217;s a somewhat intractable design problem at its core, which is that (trying to avoid spoiling) the method the player has of triggering anything meaningful by definition gives the player the trivial ability to win the game according to the terms laid out up until then.</p>
<p>The easy solution would have been to make immediately clear, via the first part of the second section, that there are now other meaningful ways of having an effect on things. Instead, we have the opposite, where it&#8217;s a 30-or-so-second wait each time to get to the portion of the second section where you *might* stumble upon something you can do that causes an effect. I think my point is that there&#8217;s not enough there to incentivize that behavior (and that the wait between failed experimental attempts is far too long). At minimum, the order of the three movements at the beginning of the second section should have been reversed.</p>
<p>But I do like the idea. And its tone. Maybe I&#8217;m overreacting and the (apparently) intended behavior just needs to be thought of as a secret and not as core gameplay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
